Re: [PATCH v2] LDT - Linux Driver Template

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:46:18AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >  Normally you just start with a
> > driver for a device like the one you need to write and modify it from
> > there.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Even if the template driver is fixed up to be the most beautiful driver
> ever made, it will still always be made for non-existing hardware.  This
> causes two major problems:
>  - the driver will not be tested, so it will have bugs
>  - the driver will not be used by anyone, so it will not be maintained
>    (remember that it is initially perfect, so there is no reason to
>    change it)
> 
> May I suggest another approach?  How about selecting a set of existing
> drivers which are suitable as templates, and put all this effort into
> making those drivers *the* perfect examples instead? Start submitting
> cleanup patches for the selected drivers until everyone is satisfied and
> then document them as starting points for anyone wanting to write a
> similar driver.

I agree, this is a much better idea.  Basing any new driver on a
known-working driver is highly preferable.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/