Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] x86/ftrace: Use __pa_symbol instead of __pa on Cvisible symbols

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 14:25 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> It is a performance improvement.
> 
> >>  	 * kernel identity mapping to modify code.
> >>  	 */
> >>  	if (within(ip, (unsigned long)_text, (unsigned long)_etext))
> >> -		ip = (unsigned long)__va(__pa(ip));
> >> +		ip = (unsigned long)__va(__pa_symbol(ip));
> >>  
> >>  	return probe_kernel_write((void *)ip, new_code, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
> >>  }
> >> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int ftrace_write(unsigned long ip, const
> >char *val, int size)
> >>  	 * kernel identity mapping to modify code.
> >>  	 */
> >>  	if (within(ip, (unsigned long)_text, (unsigned long)_etext))
> >> -		ip = (unsigned long)__va(__pa(ip));
> >> +		ip = (unsigned long)__va(__pa_symbol(ip));
> >>  
> >>  	return probe_kernel_write((void *)ip, val, size);
> >>  }
> 

#define __pa(x)		__phys_addr((unsigned long)(x))
#define __pa_symbol(x)	__pa(__phys_reloc_hide((unsigned long)(x)))


I'm confused. __pa_symbol() just calls __pa() with some macro magic to
its parameter. How is this a performance improvement?

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/