Re: [PATCH 3/6 v4] cpufreq: tolerate inexact values when collectingstats

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 02:13:38PM -0500, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> Although cpufreq_driver has a flag field, no part of cpufreq_driver
> is directly passed to the cpufreq_stat code. Only cpufreq_policy
> is. It's cleaner to do passes of the while loop than to copy the
> cpufreq_driver.flag field into cpufreq_policy and then store it again
> in cpufreq_stats.

That maybe so but this newly added loop which is only Calxeda-relevant
is called in cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans, which is the frequency change
notifier call, AFAICT.

So each cpufreq driver will be paying that small and needless penalty
now for nothing and on each frequency change. Which adds to the
kernel-wide bloat and we absolutely don't want that.

So you probably need to find a slick way of detecting calxeda hw
somewhere along the init path of cpufreq_stats_init and set a
hw-specific flag instead of adding that cost to each driver.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/