Re: numa/core regressions fixed - more testers wanted

[Ingo Molnar]

* David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I started profiling on a new machine that is an exact 
> duplicate of the 16-way, 4 node, 32GB machine I was profiling 
> with earlier to rule out any machine-specific problems.  I 
> pulled master and ran new comparisons with THP enabled at 
> c418de93e398 ("Merge branch 'x86/mm'"):
> 
>   CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING disabled	136521.55 SPECjbb2005 bops
>   CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING enabled		132476.07 SPECjbb2005 bops (-3.0%)
> 
> Aside: neither 4739578c3ab3 ("x86/mm: Don't flush the TLB on 
> #WP pmd fixups") nor 01e9c2441eee ("x86/vsyscall: Add Kconfig 
> option to use native vsyscalls and switch to it") 
> significantly improved upon the throughput on this system.

Could you please send an updated profile done with latest -tip? 
The last profile I got from you still had the vsyscall emulation 
page faults in it.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/