Re: [PATCH RESEND] acpi: Fix logging when no pci_irq is allocated

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Wed Nov 21 2012 - 16:20:31 EST


On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:53:55 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 21:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 05:46:04 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:43 +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> > > > Previously a new line is implicitly added in the no GSI case:
> > > >
> > > > [ 7.185182] pci 0001:00:12.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
> > > > [ 7.191352] pci 0001:00:12.0: PCI INT A: no GSI
> > > > [ 7.195956] - using ISA IRQ 10
> > > >
> > > > The code thus prints a blank line where no legacy IRQ is available:
> > > >
> > > > [ 1.650124] pci 0000:00:14.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
> > > > [ 1.650126] pci 0000:00:14.0: PCI INT A: no GSI
> > > > [ 1.650126]
> > > > [ 1.650180] pci 0000:00:14.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
> > > >
> > > > Fix this by making the newline explicit and removing the superfluous
> > > > one.
> > >
> > > This breaks the logging code below it when there is an ISA irq.
> > >
> > > The below works, but is a workaround for a defect in the printk
> > > subsystem introduced by a logging change that will be fixed in
> > > a near future release.
> >
> > What exactly do you mean by "near future"?
>
> I mean Jan SchÃnherr's patches that should fix this are
> likely to be picked up one day.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/13/678

Till then, we need the patch you sent, right? And it won't hurt to apply it
anyway?

Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/