Re: [PATCH 4/5] device_cgroup: make may_access() stronger

[Aristeu Rozanski]

On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:44:14AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I kinda dislike this.  This isn't a performanc critical path where we
> must try our best to shave off a few condition checks.  There's no
> reason to encode the test like this.  Please just spell the conditions
> out in code rather than trying to build a magic series of equality
> tests which somehow ends up spewing out the correct results.

sure, will do. but this is not "magic", that's just logic simplification.

-- 
Aristeu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/