Re: [PATCH] xen/blkback: do not leak mode property

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 04.12.12 at 19:21, Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
>> This looks necessary but insufficient - there's nothing really
>> preventing backend_changed() from being called more than once
>> for a given device (is simply the handler of xenbus watch). Hence
>> I think either that function needs to be guarded against multiple
>> execution (e.g. by removing the watch from that function itself,
>> if that's permitted by xenbus), or to properly deal with the
>> effects this has (including but probably not limited to the leaking
>> of be->mode).
> 
> If another watch does really trigger after the kfree(be) in
> xen_blkbk_remove(), wouldnt backend_changed access stale memory?
> So if that can really happen in practice, shouldnt the backend_watch be
> a separate allocation instead being contained within backend_info?
> 
> Looking at unregister_xenbus_watch, it clears removes the watch from the
> list, so that process_msg will not see it anymore.

That's not the scenario I was talking about: I'm concerned about
multiple calls to backend_changed() to similarly leak "mode" (and
possibly cause other bad stuff to happen) while the device is still
alive - after all it overwrites "mode" without checking what's in
there.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/