Re: [PATCH] net/macb: increase RX buffer size for GEM

[David Miller]

From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:08:22 +0100

> On 12/04/2012 07:22 PM, David Miller :
>> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:15:43 +0100
>> 
>>> Macb Ethernet controller requires a RX buffer of 128 bytes. It is
>>> highly sub-optimal for Gigabit-capable GEM that is able to use
>>> a bigger DMA buffer. Change this constant and associated macros
>>> with data stored in the private structure.
>>> I also kept the result of buffers per page calculation to lower the
>>> impact of this move to a variable rx buffer size on rx hot path.
>>> RX DMA buffer size has to be multiple of 64 bytes as indicated in
>>> DMA Configuration Register specification.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> This looks like it will waste a couple hundred bytes for 1500 MTU
>> frames, am I right?
> 
> Yep! But buffers get recycled, and with the current memory management by
> pages, it seems that I have to rework some part of it to optimize this
> memory usage (8KB memory blocks split into 5 buffers each as David said...).
> 
> Do you think it is worth digging this way or may I rework the rx buffer
> management in case of the GEM interface. If I implement a different path
> for GEM interface, I will have the possibility to tailor rx DMA buffers
> from 1500 Bytes up to 10KB jumbo frames...

I almost think you have to.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/