Re: Sharing PCIE driver between Microblaze and Arm zynq

[Bjorn Helgaas]

[+cc linux-pci]

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a question regarding to sharing generic OF pcie driver between
> two architectures MB and ARM Zynq.
> Is drivers/pci/pcie location good for it?
> Make no sense to have the same driver in two locations.

I think you're talking about a PCI host bridge driver.  It would
definitely be nice to move toward a generic, shared driver.  Host
bridge drivers are responsible for enumerating the PCI hierarchy below
the bridge.  Enumeration is not really PCIe-specific, so I wouldn't
put it in drivers/pci/pcie.

> Is using readl/writel IO functions in this driver the best option
> which we can have?
> Or is there any other recommendation?

I'm not really a driver person, but if you're writing a new driver,
wouldn't you use the iomap interfaces (ioremap(), ioread32(), etc)
rather than readl()?

> Also just want to check if it is correct to use pcie device_type.

I don't know what you're asking here.  Can you elaborate or give a
specific example?

> The rest should be the same with pci description:
> (http://devicetree.org/MPC5200:PCI#PCI_Address_Translation).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/