Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] uio.c: solve memory leak

[Cong Ding]

ping Hans, did you have any comment on this?

- cong

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Cong Ding <dinggnu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Hans, I think the memory allocated with kzalloc is properly freed
> by calling kobject_put.
>
> I can give a simple explanation.
>
> 1)  when we call kobject_init, the parameter portio_attr_type is
> passed in. portio_attr_type includes a function pointer to
> portio_release, which releases the memory of portio.
>
> 2) when we call kobject_put, kref_put is called with the pointer of
> function kobject_release.
> 3) kref_put calls kref_sub, with the same pointer of function kobject_release.
> 4) and kref_put calls the function kboject_release if
> atomic_sub_and_test returns true
>
> 5) let's look at what kobject_release is. it calls kobject_cleanup,
> and kobject_cleanup calls t->release(kobj) where t->release is exactly
> the function we passed in through portio_init at step (1). so function
> portio_release is called, and the memory allocated with kzalloc is
> freed.
>
> If there are anything wrong in my analysis, please feel free to let me know.
>
> Personally, I suggest to add a function to create and release
> uio_portio, which is similar as kobject_create and kobject_put in file
> lib/kobject.c. In this way, it avoid other readers thinking the memory
> is not freed (and we should add some comments here). For example,
> uio_portio_create call kzalloc and kboject_init, and returns
> uio_portio, which is similar as function kobject_create; and
> uio_portio_release calls kobject_put to release the memory. And we do
> same thing for uio_map.
>
> The usage here is quite strange, but it works. If I write this
> function from zero, I will use a pointer to kobject in uio_portio
> struct instead of kobject struct itself. In this case I can call
> kobject_create instead of kobject_init, and then we do both
> kzalloc(uio_portio) and kfree(uio_portio) in the file uio.c.
>
> Best,
> Cong
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Hans J. Koch <hjk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> There's still another bug: The memory allocated with kzalloc is
>> never freed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/