Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree

[Omar Ramirez Luna]

Hi All,

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:42:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c between commit 298ea44f211d ("ARM:
>>> OMAP4: hwmod data: ipu and dsp to use parent clocks instead of leaf
>>> clocks") from the iommu tree and commit 13a5b6228679 ("ARM: OMAP44xx:
>>> clock: drop obsolete clock data") from the arm-soc tree.
>>>
>>> I just deleted the file as the latter did and can carry the fix as
>>> necessary (no action is required).
>>
>> Ohad, Omar, any comment on this?
>
> I'd prefer Omar or Paul to have a look here. Looping in Tony as well.

I have checked next-20121206, it's OK to delete that file as the patch
from Paul is doing that for common clock framework migration; now the
only missing hunk from my original patch should apply to
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c which is the file that now has
ipu_fck and dsp_fck (unused) clocks, I can send a patch to remove them
through linux-omap tree.

Cheers,

Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/