Re: [PATCH] ARM: ftrace: Ensure code modifications are synchronisedacross all cpus
From: Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
Date: Fri Dec 07 2012 - 10:40:12 EST
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 10:28 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I'm not NACKing your previous patch, I was just suggesting to bring ARM
> up to the future :-)
ARM is the future ;-)
>
> I have no problems with the patch, but I just want to put it out there
> that there's better ways. It's part of the remove stomp_machine()
> crusade ;-)
Indeed, when I first cam across stop_machine(), I though 'yuck!',
especially when I realised Linux scheduling seems to mean the system
goes idle until the the next tick triggers scheduling of these 'highest
priority' threads.
--
Tixy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/