Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] net: Add support for hardware-offloadedencapsulation

[David Miller]

From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:52:43 -0800 (PST)

> 
> 
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, David Miller wrote:
> 
>> From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:41:46 -0800 (PST)
>> 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, David Miller wrote:
>> > 
>> >> From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:24:17 -0800 (PST)
>> >> 
>> >> > So the idea here is that the driver will use the headers for checksumming 
>> >> > if the skb->encapsulation bit is on. The bit should be set in the protocol 
>> >> > driver.
>> >> > 
>> >> > To answer the second comment, the flags that we use in this series of 
>> >> > patches is NETIF_F_IP_CSUM, NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM and NETIF_F_SG. These are 
>> >> > the bits that we propose will be used for checksumming of encapsulation. 
>> >> > As per a previous comment in v2, the hw_enc_features field should be used 
>> >> > also in the future when NICs have more encap offloads, so one could
>> >> > indicate these features there from the driver.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Furthermore, I submitted a patch for Rx checksumming, where NETIF_F_RXCSUM 
>> >> > is used, again in conjunction with skb->encapsulation flag. As I mention 
>> >> > in my logs, the driver is expected to set the ip_summed to UNNECESSARY and 
>> >> > turn the skb->encapsulation on, to indicate that the inner headers are 
>> >> > already HW checksummed.
>> >> > 
>> >> 
>> >> This is the kind of language that belongs in the commit message and
>> >> code comments.
>> >> 
>> > Sure. I'll wait to gather some more feedback if there is any and I will 
>> > re-spin this off adding more code comments and clarify this in the logs.
>> 
>> Great.
>> 
>> Please note that this request applies to your receive side change too.
>> 
> I believe the logs are sufficient in the rx patch:
> 
> This patch adds capability in vxlan to identify received
> checksummed inner packets and signal them to the upper layers of
> the stack. The driver needs to set the skb->encapsulation bit
> and also set the skb->ip_summed to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.
> 
> ...but I can add more comments to the code if this is what you are 
> referring to.

Yes, please do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/