On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:06:13PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:On 12/07/2012 03:03 PM, Cong Ding wrote:sorry again for lacking of experience...On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:56:16PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:On 12/07/2012 02:49 PM, Cong Ding wrote:sorry for that. so like this is fine?On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:45:43PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:Patch description please?there are 2 consts in the definition of one variable
Please put in an actual patch description. The first line (subject
line) is a title; the patch should make sense without it.
Well, except that typically you should explain which variable it is.
Yes, it is obvious if you look at the patch, but you're making the
reader spend a few more moments than necessary.
Also, you should explain what the harm is -- if it breaks anything
or is just a cosmetic issue.
and I missed another same error, so send version 2.