Re: [Devel] [PATCH 3/6] nfsd: pass net to nfsd_create_serv()

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:16:57PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 10.12.2012 12:25, Stanislav Kinsbursky ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> >07.12.2012 20:52, J. Bruce Fields ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> >>On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 04:50:16PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> >>>diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> >>>index 21cba3d..6448391 100644
> >>>--- a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> >>>+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> >>>@@ -334,10 +334,9 @@ static int nfsd_get_default_max_blksize(void)
> >>>      return ret;
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>>-int nfsd_create_serv(void)
> >>>+int nfsd_create_serv(struct net *net)
> >>>  {
> >>>      int error;
> >>>-    struct net *net = &init_net;
> >>
> >>What does this apply to?  Since 3.6-rc1 we have
> >>57c8b13e3cd0f94944c9691ce7f58e5fcef8a12d "NFSd: set nfsd_serv to NULL
> >>after service destruction" which includes:
> >>
> >>@@ -332,6 +330,7 @@ static int nfsd_get_default_max_blksize(void)
> >>  int nfsd_create_serv(void)
> >>  {
> >>         int error;
> >>+       struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> >>
> >>         WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&nfsd_mutex));
> >>         if (nfsd_serv) {
> >>
> >>Am I missing some later patch?
> >>
> >
> >Maybe I'm missing something.
> >My tree is based on yours branch "for-3.8".
> >Doe I need to rebase?
> >
> 
> My bad, sorry.
> I forgot to send one patch in this series.

Thanks, discarding this series, applying the resent version.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/