Re: [PATCH 2/2] dw_dmac: check for mapping errors
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Mon Dec 10 2012 - 08:57:15 EST
On 10 December 2012 17:06, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Otherwise we get a warning in case of CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG=y
>
> [ 45.775943] WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:933 check_unmap+0x5d6/0x6ac()
> [ 45.782369] dw_dmac dw_dmac.0: DMA-API: device driver failed to check map error[device address=0x00000000356efcc0] [size=28 bytes] [mapped as single]
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c b/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> index a9e9a07..38eea0c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> @@ -1107,6 +1107,7 @@ static int dwc_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
> struct dw_desc *desc;
> int i;
> unsigned long flags;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> dev_vdbg(chan2dev(chan), "%s\n", __func__);
>
> @@ -1131,8 +1132,7 @@ static int dwc_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
>
> desc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct dw_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!desc) {
> - dev_info(chan2dev(chan),
> - "only allocated %d descriptors\n", i);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags);
> break;
> }
> @@ -1143,6 +1143,13 @@ static int dwc_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
> desc->txd.flags = DMA_CTRL_ACK;
> desc->txd.phys = dma_map_single(chan2parent(chan), &desc->lli,
> sizeof(desc->lli), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + ret = dma_mapping_error(chan2parent(chan), desc->txd.phys);
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(desc);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> dwc_desc_put(dwc, desc);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags);
> @@ -1151,6 +1158,9 @@ static int dwc_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
>
> + if (ret)
> + dev_info(chan2dev(chan), "only allocated %d descriptors\n", i);
> +
> dev_dbg(chan2dev(chan), "%s: allocated %d descriptors\n", __func__, i);
>
> return i;
I would use goto with appropriate label: to avoid lock/unlock of spin_lock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/