Re: [PATCH 01/12] regulator: gpio-regulator: Demote GPIO Regulatordriver to start later

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 02:28:36PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This really isn't a good solution, especially not for a system that's DT
> > based - on a DT system we can tell if there should be a GPIO present so
> > we should be able to defer only when there's something that might
> > provide the GPIO later on.

> Understood, but what's the solution for non-DT systems?

Provide a fixed regulator or something, perhaps we need a "definitely
does not exist" regulator to help with this.  For every board you help
with a sequencing bodge you're probably going to break another that
needs different sequencing; for that matter it's not like GPIO
controlled regulators are exclusively used for MMC, or that MMC
exclusively uses GPIO - doing this for only one regulator is a bit of a
red flag.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/