Re: [RFC] cpuidle - remove the power_specified field in the driver

From: Julius Werner
Date: Mon Dec 10 2012 - 14:09:51 EST


Hi,

What is the current status of this? Daniel, do you think you have got
enough feedback to submit a definitive patch for this? Rafael, would
you approve of such a change?

The bug with dynamically added C-states that is tied to this still
hurts the battery life for some users across all distros every day, so
I think it would be valuable to get a consistent solution into the
mainline soon before everyone has to roll their own.

On 11/12/2012 09:26 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This patch follows the discussion about reinitializing the power usage
> when a C-state is added/removed.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/16/518
>
> We realized the power usage field is never filled and when it is
> filled for tegra, the power_specified flag is not set making all these
> values to be resetted when the driver is initialized with the set_power_state
> function.
>
> Julius and I feel this is over-engineered and the power_specified
> flag could be simply removed and continue assuming the states are
> backward sorted.
>
> The menu governor select function is simplified as the power is ordered.
> Actually the condition is always true with the current code.
>
> The cpuidle_play_dead function is also simplified by doing a reverse lookup
> on the array.
>
> The set_power_states function is removed as it does no make sense anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 17 ++++-------------
> drivers/cpuidle/driver.c | 25 -------------------------
> drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 8 ++------
> include/linux/cpuidle.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/