Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] page_alloc: Introduce zone_movable_limit[] tokeep movable limit for nodes

From: Tang Chen
Date: Mon Dec 10 2012 - 22:32:56 EST


On 12/11/2012 11:07 AM, Jianguo Wu wrote:
On 2012/12/11 10:33, Tang Chen wrote:

This patch introduces a new array zone_movable_limit[] to store the
ZONE_MOVABLE limit from movablecore_map boot option for all nodes.
The function sanitize_zone_movable_limit() will find out to which
node the ranges in movable_map.map[] belongs, and calculates the
low boundary of ZONE_MOVABLE for each node.

Signed-off-by: Tang Chen<tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu<jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Wen Congyang<wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan<laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Lin Feng<linfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 1c91d16..4853619 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static unsigned long __meminitdata arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[MAX_NR_ZONES];
static unsigned long __initdata required_kernelcore;
static unsigned long __initdata required_movablecore;
static unsigned long __meminitdata zone_movable_pfn[MAX_NUMNODES];
+static unsigned long __meminitdata zone_movable_limit[MAX_NUMNODES];

/* movable_zone is the "real" zone pages in ZONE_MOVABLE are taken from */
int movable_zone;
@@ -4340,6 +4341,77 @@ static unsigned long __meminit zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
return __absent_pages_in_range(nid, zone_start_pfn, zone_end_pfn);
}

+/**
+ * sanitize_zone_movable_limit - Sanitize the zone_movable_limit array.
+ *
+ * zone_movable_limit is initialized as 0. This function will try to get
+ * the first ZONE_MOVABLE pfn of each node from movablecore_map, and
+ * assigne them to zone_movable_limit.
+ * zone_movable_limit[nid] == 0 means no limit for the node.
+ *
+ * Note: Each range is represented as [start_pfn, end_pfn)
+ */
+static void __meminit sanitize_zone_movable_limit(void)
+{
+ int map_pos = 0, i, nid;
+ unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
+
+ if (!movablecore_map.nr_map)
+ return;
+
+ /* Iterate all ranges from minimum to maximum */
+ for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES,&start_pfn,&end_pfn,&nid) {
+ /*
+ * If we have found lowest pfn of ZONE_MOVABLE of the node
+ * specified by user, just go on to check next range.
+ */
+ if (zone_movable_limit[nid])
+ continue;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
+ /* Skip DMA memory. */
+ if (start_pfn< arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[ZONE_DMA])
+ start_pfn = arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[ZONE_DMA];
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
+ /* Skip DMA32 memory. */
+ if (start_pfn< arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[ZONE_DMA32])
+ start_pfn = arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[ZONE_DMA32];
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
+ /* Skip lowmem if ZONE_MOVABLE is highmem. */
+ if (zone_movable_is_highmem()&&

Hi Tang,

I think zone_movable_is_highmem() is not work correctly here.
sanitize_zone_movable_limit
zone_movable_is_highmem<--using movable_zone here
find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes
find_usable_zone_for_movable<--movable_zone is specified here

I think Jiang Liu's patch works fine for highmem, please refer to:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=135476085816087&w=2

Hi Wu,

Yes, I forgot movable_zone think. Thanks for reminding me. :)

But Liu's patch you just mentioned, I didn't use it because I
don't think we should skip kernelcore when movablecore_map is specified.
If these 2 options are not conflict, we should satisfy them both. :)

Of course, I also think Liu's suggestion is wonderful. But I think we
need more discussion on it. :)

I'll fix it soon.
Thanks. :)


Thanks,
Jianguo Wu

+ start_pfn< arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[ZONE_HIGHMEM])
+ start_pfn = arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[ZONE_HIGHMEM];
+#endif
+
+ if (start_pfn>= end_pfn)
+ continue;
+
+ while (map_pos< movablecore_map.nr_map) {
+ if (end_pfn<= movablecore_map.map[map_pos].start_pfn)
+ break;
+
+ if (start_pfn>= movablecore_map.map[map_pos].end_pfn) {
+ map_pos++;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The start_pfn of ZONE_MOVABLE is either the minimum
+ * pfn specified by movablecore_map, or 0, which means
+ * the node has no ZONE_MOVABLE.
+ */
+ zone_movable_limit[nid] = max(start_pfn,
+ movablecore_map.map[map_pos].start_pfn);
+
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
#else /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
static inline unsigned long __meminit zone_spanned_pages_in_node(int nid,
unsigned long zone_type,
@@ -4358,6 +4430,10 @@ static inline unsigned long __meminit zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
return zholes_size[zone_type];
}

+static void __meminit sanitize_zone_movable_limit(void)
+{
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */

static void __meminit calculate_node_totalpages(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
@@ -4923,6 +4999,7 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)

/* Find the PFNs that ZONE_MOVABLE begins at in each node */
memset(zone_movable_pfn, 0, sizeof(zone_movable_pfn));
+ sanitize_zone_movable_limit();
find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes();

/* Print out the zone ranges */





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/