Re: [PATCH RFC 05/13] of: Add empty for_each_available_child_of_node() macro definition

[Grant Likely]

On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:41:31 +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add this empty macro definition so users can be compiled without
> excluding this macro call with preprocessor directives when CONFIG_OF
> is disabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>

What non-OF code is calling this function?

g.

> ---
>  include/linux/of.h |    3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index 2fb0dbe..7df42cc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -332,6 +332,9 @@ static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
>  #define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>  	while (0)
>  
> +#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> +	while (0)
> +
>  static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
>  					const struct device_node *node,
>  					const char *name)
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/