Re: [[PATCH v9 3/3] 1/1] virtio_console: Remove buffers from out_vqat port removal

[Amit Shah]

On (Wed) 12 Dec 2012 [10:31:04], Rusty Russell wrote:
> Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On (Tue) 11 Dec 2012 [09:39:41], Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> 
> >> > On (Fri) 16 Nov 2012 [11:22:09], Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> >> > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Remove buffers from the out-queue when a port is removed. Rproc_serial
> >> >> > communicates with remote processors that may crash and leave buffers in
> >> >> > the out-queue. The virtio serial ports may have buffers in the out-queue
> >> >> > as well, e.g. for non-blocking ports and the host didn't consume them
> >> >> > yet.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [Amit: Remove WARN_ON for generic ports case.]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> 
> >> >> I already have this in my pending queue; I've promoted it to my
> >> >> virtio-next branch now.
> >> >
> >> > Rusty, I still see this series in your pending queue, not in
> >> > virtio-next.  Did anything change in the meantime?
> >> 
> >> Hmm:
> >> 
> >> 40e625ac50f40d87ddba93280d0a503425aa68e9?
> >
> > I'm sorry, I meant the remoteproc code, not this patch.
> 
> Still waiting for v9, AFIACT?

Instead of sending all patches marked v9, just this patch was
re-spun.  I think you can just pick up patches 1 and 2 from v8 (they
have my acked-by), and patch 3 was an earlier version of this one,
which should just be dropped.

		Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/