[PATCH 154/241] x86, fpu: Avoid FPU lazy restore after suspend

From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
Date: Thu Dec 13 2012 - 09:34:53 EST


3.5.7.2 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 644c154186386bb1fa6446bc5e037b9ed098db46 upstream.

When a cpu enters S3 state, the FPU state is lost.
After resuming for S3, if we try to lazy restore the FPU for a process running
on the same CPU, this will result in a corrupted FPU context.

Ensure that "fpu_owner_task" is properly invalided when (re-)initializing a CPU,
so nobody will try to lazy restore a state which doesn't exist in the hardware.

Tested with a 64-bit kernel on a 4-core Ivybridge CPU with eagerfpu=off,
by doing thousands of suspend/resume cycles with 4 processes doing FPU
operations running. Without the patch, a process is killed after a
few hundreds cycles by a SIGFPE.

Cc: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olofj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1354306532-1014-1-git-send-email-vpalatin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h | 15 +++++++++------
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
index 75f4c6d..04cb0f8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
@@ -334,14 +334,17 @@ static inline void __thread_fpu_begin(struct task_struct *tsk)
typedef struct { int preload; } fpu_switch_t;

/*
- * FIXME! We could do a totally lazy restore, but we need to
- * add a per-cpu "this was the task that last touched the FPU
- * on this CPU" variable, and the task needs to have a "I last
- * touched the FPU on this CPU" and check them.
+ * Must be run with preemption disabled: this clears the fpu_owner_task,
+ * on this CPU.
*
- * We don't do that yet, so "fpu_lazy_restore()" always returns
- * false, but some day..
+ * This will disable any lazy FPU state restore of the current FPU state,
+ * but if the current thread owns the FPU, it will still be saved by.
*/
+static inline void __cpu_disable_lazy_restore(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ per_cpu(fpu_owner_task, cpu) = NULL;
+}
+
static inline int fpu_lazy_restore(struct task_struct *new, unsigned int cpu)
{
return new == this_cpu_read_stable(fpu_owner_task) &&
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 7bd8a08..6977453 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
#include <asm/mwait.h>
#include <asm/apic.h>
#include <asm/io_apic.h>
+#include <asm/i387.h>
+#include <asm/fpu-internal.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>
#include <asm/uv/uv.h>
#include <linux/mc146818rtc.h>
@@ -826,6 +828,9 @@ int __cpuinit native_cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)

per_cpu(cpu_state, cpu) = CPU_UP_PREPARE;

+ /* the FPU context is blank, nobody can own it */
+ __cpu_disable_lazy_restore(cpu);
+
err = do_boot_cpu(apicid, cpu, tidle);
if (err) {
pr_debug("do_boot_cpu failed %d\n", err);
--
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/