RE: [PATCH v4 0/2] pstore,efi_pstore: Avoid deadlock innon-blocking paths

[Seiji Aguchi]

Anton,

V3 patch caused a build failure in Linux-next tree.
So, I updated to v4 patch.
Tony already applied the latest one.

You don't need to do anything.
And  I'm sorry for the confusion.

Seiji

<snip>
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 6:55 PM
To: Luck, Tony
Cc: linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Seiji Aguchi
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ia64 tree

Hi all,

After merging the ia64 tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64_allmodconfig) failed like this:

ERROR: "pstore_cannot_block_path" [drivers/firmware/efivars.ko] undefined!

Caused by commit 1a1df768ea4e ("efi_pstore: Avoid deadlock in non-blocking paths").

I have used the ia64 tree from next-20130110 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<snip>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anton Vorontsov [mailto:anton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anton Vorontsov
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 10:38 PM
> To: Seiji Aguchi
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Luck, Tony (tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx); dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx; dle-develop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Satoru
> Moriya
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] pstore,efi_pstore: Avoid deadlock in non-blocking paths
> 
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 06:08:52PM +0000, Seiji Aguchi wrote:
> > Changelog
> > v3 -> v4
> 
> I am confused. Tony already applied v3, no? Do you expect me to do anything with these patches, or is it just an update for Tony?
> 
> Thanks,
> Anton
¢éì®&Þ~º&¶¬–+-±éÝ¥Šw®žË±Êâmébžìdz¹Þ)í…æèw*jg¬±¨¶‰šŽŠÝj/êäz¹ÞŠà2ŠÞ¨è­Ú&¢)ß«a¶Úþø®G«éh®æj:+v‰¨Šwè†Ù>Wš±êÞiÛaxPjØm¶ŸÿÃ-»+ƒùdš_