Re: [PATCH] clk: mvebu/clk-cpu.c: fix memory leakage
From: Cong Ding
Date: Tue Jan 15 2013 - 09:41:34 EST
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:13:00PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Dear Cong Ding,
>
> On 01/14/2013 06:18 PM, Cong Ding wrote:
> > the variable cpuclk and clk_name should be properly freed.
> >
>
> Thanks for reporting this memory leak and for your patch but I think
> we could do even better, see below:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Cong Ding <dinggnu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.c | 9 ++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.c b/drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.c
> > index ff004578..1a0d84f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.c
> > @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ void __init of_cpu_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
> >
> > clks = kzalloc(ncpus * sizeof(*clks), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (WARN_ON(!clks))
> > - return;
> > + goto clks_out;
> >
> > for_each_node_by_type(dn, "cpu") {
> > struct clk_init_data init;
> > @@ -134,11 +134,11 @@ void __init of_cpu_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
> > int cpu, err;
> >
> > if (WARN_ON(!clk_name))
> > - return;
> > + goto clk_name_out;
>
> I agree
>
> >
> > err = of_property_read_u32(dn, "reg", &cpu);
> > if (WARN_ON(err))
> > - return;
> > + goto bail_out;
>
> I agree
>
> >
> > sprintf(clk_name, "cpu%d", cpu);
> > parent_clk = of_clk_get(node, 0);
> > @@ -166,7 +166,10 @@ void __init of_cpu_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
> >
> > return;
> > bail_out:
> > + kfree(clk_name);
>
> Here you free only one clk_name whereas we could have previous clk_name which have
> been already allocated during the for_each_node_by_type loop.
>
> A more annoying thing is that you use clk_name whereas it is only valid in the
> for_each_node_by_type statement and then this patch breaks the compilation:
>
> drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.c: In function âof_cpu_clk_setupâ:
> drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.c:169:8: error: âclk_nameâ undeclared (first use in this function)
> drivers/clk/mvebu/clk-cpu.c:169:8: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
sorry for the mistake, I am sending version 2.
thanks,
- cong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/