Re: [PULL] kms locking rework

[Daniel Vetter]

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I am testing your patchset (original postings at [1]).
> At a 1st look it seems to be OK.
> Any tests you want me to run?

Imo the fundamentals of the series are well-tested with the i-g-t
series, so running things on as many (non-i915) gpus as possible is
the most interesting thing. I just don't have that many radeon/nouveau
machines lying around for that ...

If you want to get really fancy, set up a zaphod dual-head config with
2 independent X servers to check whether concurrent pageflips don't
cause havoc. That needs something which pageflips, ofc.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/