Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/8] ACPI, PCI: avoid building pci_slot as module
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sun Jan 20 2013 - 18:55:45 EST
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:07:42 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> As discussed in thread at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1946851/,
> there's no value in supporting CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT=m any more.
> So change Kconfig and code to only support building pci_slot as
> built-in driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +----
> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 5 +++++
> drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c | 13 +------------
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index 0300bf6..7efd0d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE
> is about half of the penalty and is rarely useful.
>
> config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> - tristate "PCI slot detection driver"
> + bool "PCI slot detection driver"
> depends on SYSFS
> default n
> help
> @@ -308,9 +308,6 @@ config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> i.e., segment/bus/device/function tuples, with physical slots in
> the system. If you are unsure, say N.
>
> - To compile this driver as a module, choose M here:
> - the module will be called pci_slot.
> -
> config X86_PM_TIMER
> bool "Power Management Timer Support" if EXPERT
> depends on X86
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> index e050254..7374cfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ struct acpi_ec {
>
> extern struct acpi_ec *first_ec;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> +void acpi_pci_slot_init(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void acpi_pci_slot_init(void) { }
> +#endif
> int acpi_pci_root_init(void);
> int acpi_ec_init(void);
> int acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(void);
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> index d22585f..a7d7e77 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> @@ -330,19 +330,8 @@ static struct dmi_system_id acpi_pci_slot_dmi_table[] __initdata = {
> {}
> };
>
> -static int __init
> -acpi_pci_slot_init(void)
> +void __init acpi_pci_slot_init(void)
> {
> dmi_check_system(acpi_pci_slot_dmi_table);
> acpi_pci_register_driver(&acpi_pci_slot_driver);
> - return 0;
> }
> -
> -static void __exit
> -acpi_pci_slot_exit(void)
> -{
> - acpi_pci_unregister_driver(&acpi_pci_slot_driver);
> -}
> -
> -module_init(acpi_pci_slot_init);
> -module_exit(acpi_pci_slot_exit);
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index f8a0d0f..cb964ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1732,6 +1732,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
>
> acpi_power_init();
> acpi_pci_root_init();
> + acpi_pci_slot_init();
>
> /*
> * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/