Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: SoC name and revision unification

[Tony Lindgren]

* Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@xxxxxx> [130131 11:28]:
> This is a long story where for each new generation of
> OMAP we used different approaches for creating
> strings for SoCs names and revisions that this patch
> fixes. It makes future exporting of this information
> to SoC infrastructure easier.

Maybe use name soc_name and soc_rev instead and make
cpu_name and cpu_rev local to the functions?
That would reduce some churn here.

Also this does not apply to my omap-for-v3.9/soc
branch. Care to update this (and possibly the second one)
against that?

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/