On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Shuah Khan wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index 67bad4b..ed78400 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ remove_pud_table(pud_t *pud_start, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
static void __meminit
remove_pagetable(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool direct)
{
- unsigned long next;
+ unsigned long next = pgd_addr_end(start, end);
pgd_t *pgd;
pud_t *pud;
bool pgd_changed = false;
This isn't enough, there's a potential for an infinite loop if
!pgd_present() is ever true in the iteration since "next" remains
constant. Theoretical, maybe.
I think it's better to just set next before checking for !pgd_present() in
the iteration so it's clear what's happening.
Or, even better, change
this into the standard do-while loop that everything else uses.