[PATCH V2 07/15] workqueue: change argument of worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() to pool
From: Lai Jiangshan
Date: Mon Feb 18 2013 - 11:16:17 EST
We plan to only set rescuer->pool in the C.S. of pool->lock,
so when worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() is called, the worker(rescuer)->pool
may NULL. Thus we need to change the worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() API,
we need to add a @pool argument to it or use @pool argument instead of
@worker argument. we choice the later one.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index b47d1af..b987195 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1552,8 +1552,10 @@ static void worker_leave_idle(struct worker *worker)
}
/**
- * worker_maybe_bind_and_lock - bind worker to its cpu if possible and lock pool
- * @worker: self
+ * worker_maybe_bind_and_lock - bind current worker if possible and lock pool
+ * @pool: target pool
+ *
+ * Bind the worker(of current task) to the cpu of the pool if it is associated.
*
* Works which are scheduled while the cpu is online must at least be
* scheduled to a worker which is bound to the cpu so that if they are
@@ -1581,11 +1583,9 @@ static void worker_leave_idle(struct worker *worker)
* %true if the associated pool is online (@worker is successfully
* bound), %false if offline.
*/
-static bool worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(struct worker *worker)
+static bool worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(struct worker_pool *pool)
__acquires(&pool->lock)
{
- struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
-
while (true) {
/*
* The following call may fail, succeed or succeed
@@ -1623,7 +1623,7 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
static void idle_worker_rebind(struct worker *worker)
{
/* CPU may go down again inbetween, clear UNBOUND only on success */
- if (worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(worker))
+ if (worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(worker->pool))
worker_clr_flags(worker, WORKER_UNBOUND);
/* rebind complete, become available again */
@@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@ static void busy_worker_rebind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct worker *worker = container_of(work, struct worker, rebind_work);
- if (worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(worker))
+ if (worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(worker->pool))
worker_clr_flags(worker, WORKER_UNBOUND);
spin_unlock_irq(&worker->pool->lock);
@@ -2093,7 +2093,7 @@ static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker)
* on @pool's current state. Try it and adjust
* %WORKER_UNBOUND accordingly.
*/
- if (worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(worker))
+ if (worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(pool))
worker->flags &= ~WORKER_UNBOUND;
else
worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
@@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ repeat:
/* migrate to the target cpu if possible */
rescuer->pool = pool;
- worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(rescuer);
+ worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(pool);
/*
* Slurp in all works issued via this workqueue and
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/