Re: SYSFS "errors"

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:13:06PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 01:54:34PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Because sysfs is "one value per file" the lack of a file showing up
> > shouldn't cause any userspace tools any problems, that is why we did
> > things this way.
> >
> > But, of course, userspace programmers do know how to mess things up...
> 
> How about what I proposed earlier to Felipe:
> 
> --
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
> index 0ca1ca71157f..d2eef76d1d46 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
> @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ static ssize_t mci_sdram_scrub_rate_show(struct device *dev,
>  	int bandwidth = 0;
>  
>  	if (!mci->get_sdram_scrub_rate)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +		return sprintf(data, "N/A");
>  
>  	bandwidth = mci->get_sdram_scrub_rate(mci);
>  	if (bandwidth < 0) {
> 
> --
> 
> Would that hurt the sysfs policy? In this case we *can* read the file
> and it correctly tells us that scrub rate reading is not supported
> instead of having a number there.
> 
> Hmm.

I don't know, it depends on if userspace can handle this properly or
not.  What tools rely on this sysfs file?  WHat happens when they get a
non-number in the file?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/