Re[6]: [PATCH v3] mfd: syscon: Add non-DT support

[Alexander Shiyan]

...
> >> >> >>  struct regmap *syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible(const char *s)
> >> >> >>  {
> >> >> >>       struct device_node *syscon_np;
> >> >> >>       struct regmap *regmap;
> >> >> >> +     struct syscon *syscon;
> >> >> >> +     struct device *dev;
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>       syscon_np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, s);
> >> >> >> -     if (!syscon_np)
> >> >> >> +     if (syscon_np) {
> >> >> >> +             regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(syscon_np);
> >> >> >> +             of_node_put(syscon_np);
> >> >> >> +
> >> >> >> +             return regmap;
> >> >> >> +     }
> >> >> >> +
> >> >> >> +     /* Fallback to search by id_entry.name string */
> >> >> >> +     dev = driver_find_device(&syscon_driver.driver, NULL, (void *)s,
> >> >> >> +                              syscon_match_id);
> >> >> >> +     if (!dev)
> >> >> >>               return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -     regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(syscon_np);
> >> >> >> -     of_node_put(syscon_np);
> >> >> >> +     syscon = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -     return regmap;
> >> >> >> +     return syscon->regmap;
> >> >> >>  }
> >> >> >>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible);
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Since you are not actually comparing the "compatible" property here,
> >> >> > I would suggest adding another function here,
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, i also think like that.
> >> >
> >> > In this case we should provide two paths for drivers which can work as with DT
> >> > and without DT.
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >
> > I still think the universal procedure is better for the driver.
> >
> 
> Why?
> I did not see your reply on my other comments on the problems of using universal
> procedure?
> Please let me know if you think they're not issues.

Yes, I do not see a problem here.
I will try to show the code.

In the driver:
struct regmap *r;
r = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("my_super_syscon");

For DT case:
syscon@123456 {
  compatible = "my_super_syscon", "syscon";
  ...
};

For non-DT case:
struct platform_device_id id = { .name = "my_super_syscon", };
struct platform_device syscon_pdev = {                                           
  .name = "syscon",
  .id_entry = &id,
  ...
};
platform_device_register(&syscon_pdev);

Do I understand what you mean?
Thanks.

---
èº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËlzwm…ébëæìr¸›zX§»®w¥Š{ayºÊÚë,j­¢f£¢·hš‹àz¹®w¥¢¸¢·¦j:+v‰¨ŠwèjØm¶Ÿÿ¾«‘êçzZ+ƒùšŽŠÝj"ú!¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^¶m§ÿðÃnÆàþY&—