Re: [PATCH 10/11] mfd: tps65010: use devm_request_irq() anddevm_kzalloc()

[Jingoo Han]

On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:35 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:35 PM
> To: Jingoo Han
> Cc: 'Samuel Ortiz'; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] mfd: tps65010: use devm_request_irq() and devm_kzalloc()
> 
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:14:05PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > Use devm_request_irq() and devm_kzalloc() to make cleanup paths
> > more simple.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/tps65010.c |   15 +++++----------
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c
> > index da2691f..a5438cc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c
> > @@ -525,11 +525,8 @@ static int __exit tps65010_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> >  			dev_dbg(&client->dev, "board %s %s err %d\n",
> >  				"teardown", client->name, status);
> >  	}
> > -	if (client->irq > 0)
> > -		free_irq(client->irq, tps);
> >  	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&tps->work);
> >  	debugfs_remove(tps->file);
> > -	kfree(tps);
> >  	the_tps = NULL;
> >  	return 0;
> 
> Nope, again work and IRQ have to be handled in certain order.

Yes, you're right. 
I will use devm_free_irq()

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> Dmitry

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/