Re: [patch v5 10/15] sched: packing transitory tasks in wake/execpower balancing

[Alex Shi]

On 02/20/2013 04:43 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> > 
>> > Sounds reasonable too.
>> > 
>> > I have no idea of the of the decision now.
>> > And guess many guys dislike to use a knob to let user do the choice.
> Nobody likes seeing yet more knobs much, automagical is preferred.
> Trouble with automagical heuristics usage is that any heuristic will
> inevitably get it wrong sometimes, so giving the user control over usage
> is IMHO a good thing.. and once we give the user the choice, we must
> honor it, else what was the point?
> 
> Anyway, fwiw, I liked what I saw test driving the patch set..
> 
>> > What's your opinions, Peter?
> ..but maintainer opinions carry more weight than mine, even to me ;-)

:) Yes, maintainers usually heard enough arguments and can balance them...


-- 
Thanks Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/