Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-v3020: use gpio_request_one()

From: Igor Grinberg
Date: Thu Feb 21 2013 - 03:48:41 EST


On 02/21/13 10:31, Jingoo Han wrote:
> Using gpio_request_one() can make the code simpler because it can
> set the direction and initial value in one shot.

If you are on this, then I think converting to gpio_request_array()
would be even better.

>
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c | 5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c
> index bca5d67..d59cd24 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c
> @@ -125,11 +125,10 @@ static int v3020_gpio_map(struct v3020 *chip, struct platform_device *pdev,
> v3020_gpio[V3020_IO].gpio = pdata->gpio_io;
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(v3020_gpio); i++) {
> - err = gpio_request(v3020_gpio[i].gpio, v3020_gpio[i].name);
> + err = gpio_request_one(v3020_gpio[i].gpio, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH,
> + v3020_gpio[i].name);
> if (err)
> goto err_request;
> -
> - gpio_direction_output(v3020_gpio[i].gpio, 1);
> }

If you convert to gpio_request_array(), you can also drop the for loop.

>
> chip->gpio = v3020_gpio;
>

--
Regards,
Igor.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/