Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the powerpctree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Ben,

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:43:49 -0600 Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 15:52 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got conflicts in
> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c and arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c
> > > between commit 2b0a576d15e0 ("powerpc: Add new transactional memory state
> > > to the signal context") from the powerpc tree and commit 7cce246557bf
> > > ("powerpc: switch to generic sigaltstack") from the signal tree.
> > > 
> > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> > > (no action is required).
> > 
> > Mikey, can you check everything's all right ?
> > 
> > I'm happy to wait for Al stuff to go in first & fixup the conflict
> > before I send the pull request to Linus. I'm off travelling around but I
> > should be able to get stuff out this week-end.
> 
> The merge looks fine to me.  My TM signal tests still pass on
> next-20130221.

I think all you (or Al) need do is mention it to Linus when you send the
pull request - he is usually smart enough to fix these things :-) and
likes to see the interactions.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature