Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: palmas fix SMPS no voltages

[Laxman Dewangan]

On Friday 22 February 2013 06:22 AM, Ian Lartey wrote:
> From: Graeme Gregory <gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Number of voltages for SMPS regulators was off by one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c |    3 ++-
>   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
> index cde13bb..39cf146 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>    * Copyright 2011-2012 Texas Instruments Inc.
>    *
>    * Author: Graeme Gregory <gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + * Author: Ian Lartey <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    *
>    *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>    *  under  the terms of the GNU General  Public License as published by the
> @@ -156,7 +157,7 @@ static const struct regs_info palmas_regs_info[] = {
>    *
>    * So they are basically (maxV-minV)/stepV
>    */
> -#define PALMAS_SMPS_NUM_VOLTAGES	116
> +#define PALMAS_SMPS_NUM_VOLTAGES	117

Yes, if we keep one for  0.5V and one for 1.65 the it becomes 117 
including off.

Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/