[PATCH] Fix: compat_rw_copy_check_uvector() misuse in aio, readv,writev, and security keys
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Mon Feb 25 2013 - 10:20:44 EST
Looking at mm/process_vm_access.c:process_vm_rw() and comparing it to
compat_process_vm_rw() shows that the compatibility code requires an
explicit "access_ok()" check before calling
compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(). The same difference seems to appear when
we compare fs/read_write.c:do_readv_writev() to
fs/compat.c:compat_do_readv_writev().
This subtle difference between the compat and non-compat requirements
should probably be debated, as it seems to be error-prone. In fact,
there are two others sites that use this function in the Linux kernel,
and they both seem to get it wrong:
Now shifting our attention to fs/aio.c, we see that aio_setup_iocb()
also ends up calling compat_rw_copy_check_uvector() through
aio_setup_vectored_rw(). Unfortunately, the access_ok() check appears to
be missing. Same situation for
security/keys/compat.c:compat_keyctl_instantiate_key_iov().
I propose that we add the access_ok() check directly into
compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(), so callers don't have to worry about it,
and it therefore makes the compat call code similar to its non-compat
counterpart. Place the access_ok() check in the same location where
copy_from_user() can trigger a -EFAULT error in the non-compat code, so
the ABI behaviors are alike on both compat and non-compat.
While we are here, fix compat_do_readv_writev() so it checks for
compat_rw_copy_check_uvector() negative return values.
And also, fix a memory leak in compat_keyctl_instantiate_key_iov() error
handling.
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/compat.c | 15 +++++++--------
mm/process_vm_access.c | 8 --------
security/keys/compat.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Index: linux/fs/compat.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/fs/compat.c
+++ linux/fs/compat.c
@@ -558,6 +558,10 @@ ssize_t compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(int
}
*ret_pointer = iov;
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, uvector, nr_segs*sizeof(*uvector)))
+ goto out;
+
/*
* Single unix specification:
* We should -EINVAL if an element length is not >= 0 and fitting an
@@ -1080,17 +1084,12 @@ static ssize_t compat_do_readv_writev(in
if (!file->f_op)
goto out;
- ret = -EFAULT;
- if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, uvector, nr_segs*sizeof(*uvector)))
- goto out;
-
- tot_len = compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(type, uvector, nr_segs,
+ ret = compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(type, uvector, nr_segs,
UIO_FASTIOV, iovstack, &iov);
- if (tot_len == 0) {
- ret = 0;
+ if (ret <= 0)
goto out;
- }
+ tot_len = ret;
ret = rw_verify_area(type, file, pos, tot_len);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Index: linux/mm/process_vm_access.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/process_vm_access.c
+++ linux/mm/process_vm_access.c
@@ -429,12 +429,6 @@ compat_process_vm_rw(compat_pid_t pid,
if (flags != 0)
return -EINVAL;
- if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, lvec, liovcnt * sizeof(*lvec)))
- goto out;
-
- if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, rvec, riovcnt * sizeof(*rvec)))
- goto out;
-
if (vm_write)
rc = compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(WRITE, lvec, liovcnt,
UIO_FASTIOV, iovstack_l,
@@ -459,8 +453,6 @@ free_iovecs:
kfree(iov_r);
if (iov_l != iovstack_l)
kfree(iov_l);
-
-out:
return rc;
}
Index: linux/security/keys/compat.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/security/keys/compat.c
+++ linux/security/keys/compat.c
@@ -40,12 +40,12 @@ static long compat_keyctl_instantiate_ke
ARRAY_SIZE(iovstack),
iovstack, &iov);
if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ goto err;
if (ret == 0)
goto no_payload_free;
ret = keyctl_instantiate_key_common(id, iov, ioc, ret, ringid);
-
+err:
if (iov != iovstack)
kfree(iov);
return ret;
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/