Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

[Yinghai Lu]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Martin Bligh <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 4, it does not CC to TJ and other numa guys...
>>>
>>> attached workaround the problem for now.
>>> but it will assume NUMAQ would not have SRAT table.
>>
>>  Martin, can you confirm that numaq does not have srat?
>
> No, it's pre-SRAT. I forget the exact name of the table, but no SRAT until x440.
>
> OTOH, you should probably feel free to break it by now, I can't
> imagine they are any use to man nor beast any more.

Do you mean we can remove numaq x86 32bit code now?

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/