Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

[Tang Chen]

On 02/26/2013 12:51 PM, Martin Bligh wrote:
> > Do you mean we can remove numaq x86 32bit code now?
>
> Wouldn't bother me at all. The machine is from 1995, end of life c. 2000?
> Was useful in the early days of getting NUMA up and running on Linux,
> but is now too old to be a museum piece, really.
>
> M.

Hi Martin, Yinghai,

It was me that I failed to make numa_init() fall back path working, and 
forgot
to call early_parse_srat in ia64. Sorry for the breaking of other 
platform. :)

So now, is Yinghai's patch enough for this problem ?
Or we can encapsulate the following clear up work into one function ?

+		for (i = 0; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++)
+			set_apicid_to_node(i, NUMA_NO_NODE);
+		nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed);
+		memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo));


Thanks. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/