[ 32/86] mm/fadvise.c: drain all pagevecs if POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED fails to discard all pages

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>

commit 67d46b296a1ba1477c0df8ff3bc5e0167a0b0732 upstream.

Rob van der Heij reported the following (paraphrased) on private mail.

	The scenario is that I want to avoid backups to fill up the page
	cache and purge stuff that is more likely to be used again (this is
	with s390x Linux on z/VM, so I don't give it as much memory that
	we don't care anymore). So I have something with LD_PRELOAD that
	intercepts the close() call (from tar, in this case) and issues
	a posix_fadvise() just before closing the file.

	This mostly works, except for small files (less than 14 pages)
	that remains in page cache after the face.

Unfortunately Rob has not had a chance to test this exact patch but the
test program below should be reproducing the problem he described.

The issue is the per-cpu pagevecs for LRU additions.  If the pages are
added by one CPU but fadvise() is called on another then the pages
remain resident as the invalidate_mapping_pages() only drains the local
pagevecs via its call to pagevec_release().  The user-visible effect is
that a program that uses fadvise() properly is not obeyed.

A possible fix for this is to put the necessary smarts into
invalidate_mapping_pages() to globally drain the LRU pagevecs if a
pagevec page could not be discarded.  The downside with this is that an
inode cache shrink would send a global IPI and memory pressure
potentially causing global IPI storms is very undesirable.

Instead, this patch adds a check during fadvise(POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) to
check if invalidate_mapping_pages() discarded all the requested pages.
If a subset of pages are discarded it drains the LRU pagevecs and tries
again.  If the second attempt fails, it assumes it is due to the pages
being mapped, locked or dirty and does not care.  With this patch, an
application using fadvise() correctly will be obeyed but there is a
downside that a malicious application can force the kernel to send
global IPIs and increase overhead.

If accepted, I would like this to be considered as a -stable candidate.
It's not an urgent issue but it's a system call that is not working as
advertised which is weak.

The following test program demonstrates the problem.  It should never
report that pages are still resident but will without this patch.  It
assumes that CPU 0 and 1 exist.

int main() {
	int fd;
	int pagesize = getpagesize();
	ssize_t written = 0, expected;
	char *buf;
	unsigned char *vec;
	int resident, i;
	cpu_set_t set;

	/* Prepare a buffer for writing */
	expected = FILESIZE_PAGES * pagesize;
	buf = malloc(expected + 1);
	if (buf == NULL) {
		printf("ENOMEM\n");
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}
	buf[expected] = 0;
	memset(buf, 'a', expected);

	/* Prepare the mincore vec */
	vec = malloc(FILESIZE_PAGES);
	if (vec == NULL) {
		printf("ENOMEM\n");
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}

	/* Bind ourselves to CPU 0 */
	CPU_ZERO(&set);
	CPU_SET(0, &set);
	if (sched_setaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(set), &set) == -1) {
		perror("sched_setaffinity");
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}

	/* open file, unlink and write buffer */
	fd = open("fadvise-test-file", O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_RDWR);
	if (fd == -1) {
		perror("open");
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}
	unlink("fadvise-test-file");
	while (written < expected) {
		ssize_t this_write;
		this_write = write(fd, buf + written, expected - written);

		if (this_write == -1) {
			perror("write");
			exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
		}

		written += this_write;
	}
	free(buf);

	/*
	 * Force ourselves to another CPU. If fadvise only flushes the local
	 * CPUs pagevecs then the fadvise will fail to discard all file pages
	 */
	CPU_ZERO(&set);
	CPU_SET(1, &set);
	if (sched_setaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(set), &set) == -1) {
		perror("sched_setaffinity");
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}

	/* sync and fadvise to discard the page cache */
	fsync(fd);
	if (posix_fadvise(fd, 0, expected, POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) == -1) {
		perror("posix_fadvise");
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}

	/* map the file and use mincore to see which parts of it are resident */
	buf = mmap(NULL, expected, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
	if (buf == NULL) {
		perror("mmap");
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}
	if (mincore(buf, expected, vec) == -1) {
		perror("mincore");
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}

	/* Check residency */
	for (i = 0, resident = 0; i < FILESIZE_PAGES; i++) {
		if (vec[i])
			resident++;
	}
	if (resident != 0) {
		printf("Nr unexpected pages resident: %d\n", resident);
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}

	munmap(buf, expected);
	close(fd);
	free(vec);
	exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Rob van der Heij <rvdheij@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Rob van der Heij <rvdheij@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 mm/fadvise.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/fadvise.c
+++ b/mm/fadvise.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <linux/fadvise.h>
 #include <linux/writeback.h>
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/swap.h>
 
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
 
@@ -124,9 +125,22 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE(fadvise64_64)(int fd, lof
 		start_index = (offset+(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE-1)) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
 		end_index = (endbyte >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT);
 
-		if (end_index >= start_index)
-			invalidate_mapping_pages(mapping, start_index,
+		if (end_index >= start_index) {
+			unsigned long count = invalidate_mapping_pages(mapping,
+						start_index, end_index);
+
+			/*
+			 * If fewer pages were invalidated than expected then
+			 * it is possible that some of the pages were on
+			 * a per-cpu pagevec for a remote CPU. Drain all
+			 * pagevecs and try again.
+			 */
+			if (count < (end_index - start_index + 1)) {
+				lru_add_drain_all();
+				invalidate_mapping_pages(mapping, start_index,
 						end_index);
+			}
+		}
 		break;
 	default:
 		ret = -EINVAL;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/