Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf annotate: Fix build with NO_NEWT=1

[li guang]

å 2013-02-27äç 12:22 +1100ïMichael Ellermanåéï
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 09:14:28AM +0800, li guang wrote:
> > å 2013-02-26äç 18:02 +0900ïNamhyung Kimåéï
> > > Hi Michael,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:02:02 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > Commit 18c9e5c "Make it to be able to skip unannotatable symbols" broke
> > > > the build with NO_NEWT=1:
> > > >
> > > >    CC builtin-annotate.o
> > > > builtin-annotate.c: In function 'hists__find_annotations':
> > > > builtin-annotate.c:161:4: error: duplicate case value
> > > > builtin-annotate.c:154:4: error: previously used here
> > > > make: *** [builtin-annotate.o] Error 1
> > > >
> > > > This is because without NEWT support K_LEFT is #defined to -1 in
> > > > utils/hist.h
> > > >
> > > > Fix it by shifting the K_LEFT/K_RIGHT #defines out of the likely range
> > > > of error values.
> > > 
> > > Argh, didn't check NO_NEWT build on this, sorry.
> > > 
> > > The hist_entry__tui_annotate() - hence, symbol__tui_annotate() - returns
> > > either key code or error code.  This is not good IMHO but not sure it's
> > > worth refactoring.  Maybe we can move the error check to under default
> > > case so that possible future error checks to be done?
> > 
> > or can we skip gui-code-snippet when there's no gui library?
> > anyway, for present fix-up, we can just temporarily change K_LEFT value
> > like Michael's or my patch, I think.
> 
> Sorry I didn't see your patch, but yes I agree, either is fine and fixes
> the build for now.
> 
> cheers

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/25/486

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/