[for-next][PATCH 2/8] tracing: Use RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS for TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed Feb 27 2013 - 12:50:11 EST
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Both RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS and TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU are defined as
-1 and used to say that all the ring buffers are to be modified
or read (instead of just a single cpu, which would be >= 0).
There's no reason to keep TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU as it is also started
to be used for more than what it was created for, and now that
the ring buffer code added a generic RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS define,
we can clean up the trace code to use that instead and remove
the TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU macro.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
kernel/trace/trace.h | 2 --
kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index a2756a0..e06f1aa 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -287,13 +287,13 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mutex, cpu_access_lock);
static inline void trace_access_lock(int cpu)
{
- if (cpu == TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU) {
+ if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
/* gain it for accessing the whole ring buffer. */
down_write(&all_cpu_access_lock);
} else {
/* gain it for accessing a cpu ring buffer. */
- /* Firstly block other trace_access_lock(TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU). */
+ /* Firstly block other trace_access_lock(RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS). */
down_read(&all_cpu_access_lock);
/* Secondly block other access to this @cpu ring buffer. */
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static inline void trace_access_lock(int cpu)
static inline void trace_access_unlock(int cpu)
{
- if (cpu == TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU) {
+ if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
up_write(&all_cpu_access_lock);
} else {
mutex_unlock(&per_cpu(cpu_access_lock, cpu));
@@ -1822,7 +1822,7 @@ __find_next_entry(struct trace_iterator *iter, int *ent_cpu,
* If we are in a per_cpu trace file, don't bother by iterating over
* all cpu and peek directly.
*/
- if (cpu_file > TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU) {
+ if (cpu_file > RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
if (ring_buffer_empty_cpu(buffer, cpu_file))
return NULL;
ent = peek_next_entry(iter, cpu_file, ent_ts, missing_events);
@@ -1982,7 +1982,7 @@ static void *s_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
iter->cpu = 0;
iter->idx = -1;
- if (cpu_file == TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU) {
+ if (cpu_file == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu)
tracing_iter_reset(iter, cpu);
} else
@@ -2290,7 +2290,7 @@ int trace_empty(struct trace_iterator *iter)
int cpu;
/* If we are looking at one CPU buffer, only check that one */
- if (iter->cpu_file != TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU) {
+ if (iter->cpu_file != RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
cpu = iter->cpu_file;
buf_iter = trace_buffer_iter(iter, cpu);
if (buf_iter) {
@@ -2509,7 +2509,7 @@ __tracing_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, bool snapshot)
if (!iter->snapshot)
tracing_stop();
- if (iter->cpu_file == TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU) {
+ if (iter->cpu_file == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu) {
iter->buffer_iter[cpu] =
ring_buffer_read_prepare(iter->tr->buffer, cpu);
@@ -2593,7 +2593,7 @@ static int tracing_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
(file->f_flags & O_TRUNC)) {
long cpu = (long) inode->i_private;
- if (cpu == TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU)
+ if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS)
tracing_reset_online_cpus(&global_trace);
else
tracing_reset(&global_trace, cpu);
@@ -4979,7 +4979,7 @@ static __init int tracer_init_debugfs(void)
NULL, &tracing_cpumask_fops);
trace_create_file("trace", 0644, d_tracer,
- (void *) TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU, &tracing_fops);
+ (void *) RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS, &tracing_fops);
trace_create_file("available_tracers", 0444, d_tracer,
&global_trace, &show_traces_fops);
@@ -4999,7 +4999,7 @@ static __init int tracer_init_debugfs(void)
NULL, &tracing_readme_fops);
trace_create_file("trace_pipe", 0444, d_tracer,
- (void *) TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU, &tracing_pipe_fops);
+ (void *) RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS, &tracing_pipe_fops);
trace_create_file("buffer_size_kb", 0644, d_tracer,
(void *) RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS, &tracing_entries_fops);
@@ -5106,7 +5106,7 @@ void trace_init_global_iter(struct trace_iterator *iter)
{
iter->tr = &global_trace;
iter->trace = current_trace;
- iter->cpu_file = TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU;
+ iter->cpu_file = RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS;
}
static void
@@ -5154,7 +5154,7 @@ __ftrace_dump(bool disable_tracing, enum ftrace_dump_mode oops_dump_mode)
switch (oops_dump_mode) {
case DUMP_ALL:
- iter.cpu_file = TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU;
+ iter.cpu_file = RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS;
break;
case DUMP_ORIG:
iter.cpu_file = raw_smp_processor_id();
@@ -5163,7 +5163,7 @@ __ftrace_dump(bool disable_tracing, enum ftrace_dump_mode oops_dump_mode)
goto out_enable;
default:
printk(KERN_TRACE "Bad dumping mode, switching to all CPUs dump\n");
- iter.cpu_file = TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU;
+ iter.cpu_file = RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS;
}
printk(KERN_TRACE "Dumping ftrace buffer:\n");
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index ef11984..0698e49 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -449,8 +449,6 @@ static __always_inline void trace_clear_recursion(int bit)
current->trace_recursion = val;
}
-#define TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU -1
-
static inline struct ring_buffer_iter *
trace_buffer_iter(struct trace_iterator *iter, int cpu)
{
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c
index 3c5c5df..cc1dbdc 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static void ftrace_dump_buf(int skip_lines, long cpu_file)
iter.iter_flags |= TRACE_FILE_LAT_FMT;
iter.pos = -1;
- if (cpu_file == TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU) {
+ if (cpu_file == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu) {
iter.buffer_iter[cpu] =
ring_buffer_read_prepare(iter.tr->buffer, cpu);
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static int kdb_ftdump(int argc, const char **argv)
!cpu_online(cpu_file))
return KDB_BADINT;
} else {
- cpu_file = TRACE_PIPE_ALL_CPU;
+ cpu_file = RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS;
}
kdb_trap_printk++;
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/