Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for LZ4-compressed kernel

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:51:39 +0000
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 04:36:47PM +0900, Kyungsik Lee wrote:
> > Compiler: Linaro ARM gcc 4.6.2
> > 2. ARMv7, 1.7GHz based board
> >    Kernel: linux 3.7
> >    Uncompressed Kernel Size: 14MB
> >          Compressed Size  Decompression Speed
> >     LZO  6.0MB            34.1MB/s            Old
> >          ----------------------------------------
> >          6.0MB            34.7MB/s            New
> >          6.0MB            52.2MB/s(UA)
> >     =============================================
> >     LZ4  6.5MB            86.7MB/s
> > UA: Unaligned memory Access support
> 
> That is pretty conclusive - it shows an 8% increase in image size vs a
> 66% increase in decompression speed.  It will take a _lot_ to offset
> that increase in decompression speed.
> 
> So, what I think is that yes, we should accept LZ4 and drop LZO from
> the kernel - the "fast but may not be small" compression title has
> clearly been taken by LZ4.
> 
> Akpm - what's your thoughts?

It sounds like we should merge both.

I've sent Linus a little reminder for Markus's 3.9 pull request.  Let's
get down and review and test this new code?

David's review comments were useful.

I'd like to also see a Kconfig patch which makes x86 and arm kernels
default to the new LZ4 code.  Then I can sneak that patch into
linux-next so the new code will get some testing.  If we don't do that,
very few people will run it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/