Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds: Add support for Palmas LEDs

[Ian Lartey]

On 28/02/13 05:44, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 February 2013 06:43 PM, Ian Lartey wrote:
> > The Palmas familly of chips has LED support. This is not always muxed
> > to output pins so depending on the setting of the mux this driver
> > will create the appropriate LED class devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Patch 1 and 2 can be merged together as this is makefile, Kconfig and
> driver addition.

This could cause a merge conflict for anyone adding files/drivers
in drivers/leds so it's safer to separate the Kconfig and Makefile
from the actual drver source code so that can go in conflict free.

> > +
> > +static int palmas_led_read(struct palmas_leds_data *leds, unsigned
> > int reg,
> > +               unsigned int *dest)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned int addr;
> > +
> > +       addr = PALMAS_BASE_TO_REG(PALMAS_LED_BASE, reg);
> This is not require. Infact doing this will not work.

Yes, of course, thanks for that.
> palmas_read already take care of proper offset.
>          unsigned int addr =  PALMAS_BASE_TO_REG(base, reg);
>          int slave_id = PALMAS_BASE_TO_SLAVE(base);
>
>          return regmap_read(palmas->regmap[slave_id], addr, val);
>
>
> same for other places also.

ditto.

> > +static void palmas_leds_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > +       struct palmas_led *led = container_of(work, struct palmas_led,
> > work);
> > +       unsigned int period, ctrl;
> > +       unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +       mutex_lock(&led->mutex);
> > +
> > +       palmas_led_read(led->leds_data, PALMAS_LED_CTRL, &ctrl);
> > +       palmas_led_read(led->leds_data, PALMAS_LED_PERIOD_CTRL, &period);
> > +
> > +       spin_lock_irqsave(&led->value_lock, flags);
> > +
> > +       switch (led->led_no) {
> > +       case 1:
> > +               ctrl &= ~PALMAS_LED_CTRL_LED_1_ON_TIME_MASK;
> > +               period &= ~PALMAS_LED_PERIOD_CTRL_LED_1_PERIOD_MASK;
> > +
>
> case 1,2,3 and 4 looks same, jus shift/mask are changed. I think this
> can be rewritten here to reduce code size.

Will do.

> > +static int palmas_leds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +       struct palmas *palmas = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> > +       struct palmas_leds_platform_data *pdata =
> > pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > +       struct palmas_leds_data *leds_data;
> > +       struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > +       int ret, i;
> > +       int offset = 0;
> > +
> > +       if (!palmas->led_muxed &&
> > !is_palmas_charger(palmas->product_id)) {
> > +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "there are no LEDs muxed\n");
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       /* Palmas charger requires platform data */
> > +       if (is_palmas_charger(palmas->product_id) && node && !pdata) {
> > +               pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > +
> > +               if (!pdata)
> > +                       return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +               ret = palmas_dt_to_pdata(&pdev->dev, node, pdata);
> > +               if (ret)
> > +                       return ret;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       if (is_palmas_charger(palmas->product_id) && !pdata)
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       leds_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*leds_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Use devm_kzalloc().

Noted.

> > +
> > +static int  palmas_leds_init(void)
> > +{
> > +       return platform_driver_register(&palmas_leds_driver);
> > +}
> > +module_init(palmas_leds_init);
> > +
> > +static void palmas_leds_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +       platform_driver_unregister(&palmas_leds_driver);
> > +}
> > +module_exit(palmas_leds_exit);
>
> use Module_platform_driver().

Will do.

>


Thanks,

Ian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/