Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: wakeup buddy

[Namhyung Kim]

2013-02-28 (ë), 11:06 +0100, Mike Galbraith:
> On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 18:25 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 
> > Not sure if it should require bidirectional relationship.  Looks like
> > just for benchmarks.  Isn't there a one-way relationship that could get
> > a benefit from this?  I don't know ;-)
> 
> ??  Meaningful relationships are bare minimum bidirectional, how can you
> describe one connection and have it remain meaningful?  I love "her" is
> unlikely to lead to anything meaningful if "she" doesn't know you exist.

Maybe I misunderstood something.  I was thinking about typical
cooperation models like manager-worker, producer-consumer or pipeline
and thought that they are usually one-way relationship in terms of the
wakeup.

Thanks,
Namhyung


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/