Re: [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10-tmp] workqueue: implement workqueue withcustom worker attributes

[Tejun Heo]

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 05:01:13AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey, Lai.
> 
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 06:34:33PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > > This patchset contains the following 31 patches.
> > > 
> > >  0001-workqueue-make-sanity-checks-less-punshing-using-WAR.patch
> > 
> > >  0002-workqueue-make-workqueue_lock-irq-safe.patch
> > 
> > workqueue_lock protects too many things. We can introduce different locks
> > for different purpose later.
> 
> I don't know.  My general attitude toward locking is the simpler the
> better.  None of the paths protected by workqueue_lock are hot.
> There's no actual benefit in making them finer grained.

Heh, I need to make workqueues and pools protected by a mutex rather
than spinlock, so I'm breaking out the locking after all.  This is
gonna be a separate series of patches and it seems like there are
gonna be three locks - wq_mutex (pool and workqueues), pwq_lock
(spinlock protecting pwqs), wq_mayday_lock (lock for the mayday list).

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/