RE: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: support for clock which arenot in DT yet.

[J, KEERTHY]

Hi Nishanth,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Menon, Nishanth
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 8:06 PM
> To: Cousson, Benoit
> Cc: Shilimkar, Santosh; cpufreq; Rafael J. Wysocki; Shawn Guo; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: support for clock which
> are not in DT yet.
> 
> On 15:24-20130312, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > On 03/12/2013 06:03 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 12 March 2013 04:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > >> On certain SoCs like variants of OMAP, the clock conversion to DT
> > >> is not complete. In short, the ability to:
> > >> cpus {
> > >>     cpu@0 {
> > >> 	clocks = <&cpuclk 0>;
> > >>     };
> > >>  };
> > >> is not possible. However, the clock node is registered.
> > >> Allow for clk names to be provided as string so as to be used when
> needed.
> > >> Example (for OMAP3630):
> > >> cpus {
> > >>     cpu@0 {
> > >> 	clock-name = "cpufreq_ck";
> > >>     };
> > >>  };
> > >>
> > >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > >> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
> > >> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Cc: cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Cc: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
> > >> ---
> > > Seems a reasonable to me.
> >
> > No, it is not...
> >
> > You cannot add a temp binding just because the OMAP support is not
> > there, since the real binding already exist.
> >
> > You need to register properly a clock provider to be able to
> reference
> > it.
> > If you do need a hacky temp code you could do it in OMAP code but not
> > in the binding.
> 
> OK. My intent is to remove omap-cpufreq.c. So, I guess I could do
> something like the following (not tested yet), but would that be the
> right approach?

Similar attempt was done for am33xx_clks in this by Shawn:

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg84157.html

> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2420_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> omap2/cclock2420_data.c
> index 0f0a97c..c3017deb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2420_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2420_data.c
> @@ -1885,7 +1885,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap2420_clks[] = {
>  	CLK(NULL,	"timer_32k_ck",	&func_32k_ck,	CK_242X),
>  	CLK(NULL,	"timer_sys_ck",	&sys_ck,	CK_242X),
>  	CLK(NULL,	"timer_ext_ck",	&alt_ck,	CK_242X),
> -	CLK(NULL,	"cpufreq_ck",	&virt_prcm_set,	CK_242X),
> +	CLK(NULL,	"cpufreq-cpu0.0",	&virt_prcm_set,	CK_242X),
>  };
> 
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2430_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> omap2/cclock2430_data.c
> index aed8f74..7000ca4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2430_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock2430_data.c
> @@ -2001,7 +2001,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap2430_clks[] = {
>  	CLK(NULL,	"timer_32k_ck",  &func_32k_ck,   CK_243X),
>  	CLK(NULL,	"timer_sys_ck",	&sys_ck,	CK_243X),
>  	CLK(NULL,	"timer_ext_ck",	&alt_ck,	CK_243X),
> -	CLK(NULL,	"cpufreq_ck",	&virt_prcm_set,	CK_243X),
> +	CLK(NULL,	"cpufreq-cpu0.0",	&virt_prcm_set,	CK_243X),

Device name and the clk_name should be interchanged right?

Something like this?

CLK("cpufreq-cpu0.0",	 NULL,	&virt_prcm_set,	CK_243X),

If yes the same should apply to all the instances.

>  };
> 
>  static const char *enable_init_clks[] = { diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-
> omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c
> index 4579c3c..7a1dfde 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c
> @@ -3501,7 +3501,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap3xxx_clks[] = {
>  	CLK(NULL,	"uart4_ick",	&uart4_ick_am35xx,	CK_AM35XX),
>  	CLK(NULL,	"timer_32k_ck",	&omap_32k_fck,  CK_3XXX),
>  	CLK(NULL,	"timer_sys_ck",	&sys_ck,	CK_3XXX),
> -	CLK(NULL,	"cpufreq_ck",	&dpll1_ck,	CK_3XXX),
> +	CLK(NULL,	"cpufreq-cpu0.0",	&dpll1_ck,	CK_3XXX),
>  };
> 
>  static const char *enable_init_clks[] = { diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-
> omap2/cclock44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c
> index 3d58f33..5fad1da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c
> @@ -1660,7 +1660,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap44xx_clks[] = {
>  	CLK("4013a000.timer",	"timer_sys_ck",	&syc_clk_div_ck,
> 	CK_443X),
>  	CLK("4013c000.timer",	"timer_sys_ck",	&syc_clk_div_ck,
> 	CK_443X),
>  	CLK("4013e000.timer",	"timer_sys_ck",	&syc_clk_div_ck,
> 	CK_443X),
> -	CLK(NULL,	"cpufreq_ck",	&dpll_mpu_ck,	CK_443X),
> +	CLK(NULL,	"cpufreq-cpu0.0",	&dpll_mpu_ck,	CK_443X),
>  };
> 
>  int __init omap4xxx_clk_init(void)
> --
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap"
> in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo
> info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/