Re: [PATCH 0/8] cgroup: a bunch of cleanups

[Li Zefan]

On 2013/3/13 6:38, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:49:52PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> Hi Tejun,
>>
>> If you're busy with other stuff, just take your time to go through those
>> patches.
>>
>> 0001-cgroup-remove-cgroup_is_descentant.patch
>> 0002-cgroup-remove-unused-variables-in-cgroup_destroy_loc.patch
>> 0003-cgroup-hold-cgroup_mutex-before-calling-css_offline.patch
>> 0004-cgroup-don-t-bother-to-resize-pid-array.patch
>> 0005-cgroup-remove-useless-code-in-cgroup_write_event_con.patch
>> 0006-cgroup-remove-unneeded-includes-from-cgroup.h.patch
>> 0007-cgroup-fix-an-almost-harmless-off-by-one-bug.patch
>> 0008-cgroup-consolidate-cgroup_attach_task-and-cgroup_att.patch
> 
> 0001-0007 applied to cgroup/for-3.10.  0008 looks fine but in the diff
> cgroup_attach_task_all() is removed completely and added back in
> slightly different form.

At first I thought cgroup_attach_task() was static, so I thought I had
to either move cgroup_attach_task_all() after cgroup_attach_task(),
or add a forward declaration of cgroup_attach_task() in order to pass
compile.

Then I found it was extern, but I forgot to revert this diff.

Will send a v2.

> If you wanna keep the functions ordered like
> you posted, please put a separate patch to move
> cgroup_attach_task_all() before the consolidation.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/