On 13 March 2013 11:03, Paul Bolle<pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi,On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 10:51 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:Ah, yes, the inital submission only included RT305X support, notThe actual accepted Kconfig symbol names are different though, so theyThanks. Note that I could not find an actual Kconfig symbol SOC_RT288X!
should be changed in rt2x00 to match them (SOC_RT288X and SOC_RT305X).
RT288X (and neither of the newer chips). These will come later.
Anyhow, I guess somebody has the (trivial) patch to convertYes, that should be everything. John Crispin, anything missing from that?
RALINK_RT...X and CONFIG_RALINK_RT...X to their SOC_* equivalents queued
for inclusion in v3.9-rcX. Is that correct?
Jonas