[PATCH 052/102] Btrfs: use set_nlink if our i_nlink is 0

[Luis Henriques]

3.5.7.10 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9bf7a4890518186238d2579be16ecc5190a707c0 upstream.

We need to inc the nlink of deleted entries when running replay so we can do the
unlink on the fs_root and get everything cleaned up and then have the orphan
cleanup do the right thing.  The problem is inc_nlink complains about this, even
thought it still does the right thing.  So use set_nlink() if our i_nlink is 0
to keep users from seeing the warnings during log replay.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ luis: adjust context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index 8abeae4..aad8644 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -1132,7 +1132,10 @@ static noinline int link_to_fixup_dir(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 
 	btrfs_release_path(path);
 	if (ret == 0) {
-		btrfs_inc_nlink(inode);
+		if (!inode->i_nlink)
+			set_nlink(inode, 1);
+		else
+			btrfs_inc_nlink(inode);
 		btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, inode);
 	} else if (ret == -EEXIST) {
 		ret = 0;
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/